As a recruiter, should I assume when a client says “confidential search” (employee is still in the position) the confidentiality remains through the phone interview with the client?
I realize I’m exposing a bigger issue with this question; that being the recruiter/client communication (or lack thereof), but there must be some tacitly accepted SOP for a confidential search.
My issue: If I identify and screen a candidate; if I’m in receipt of the resume and my candidate is fully engaged in the process, am I breaching confidentiality by telling him/her the name of the company? I would think, at this point where candidate is fully engaged, that this would be OK. It’s also anti-intuitive to let one of your candidates go into an interview not knowing the name or anything about the company. An ethical case could be made on the candidate’s side; meaning, it might not be “just” to withhold vital information from the candidate. Why would a candidate take the position of ignorance and expose his personal detail and background to a person/company that is totally anonymous?
My thought is that a company’s name should remain confidential up to the point where the candidate is engaged in the search. It just doesn’t seem far to expect a candidate to spend his/her time of 2-3 interviews without any confirmation that the process is even legit.
So again, the question is: In regard to a confidential search where the position is not officially yet opened, ought the company name be disclosed at anytime during the process?
Thanks,


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote







Bookmarks