Diligence in Recruiting / a Job Search

[David Sandusky]

I have noticed why many hiring situations result in failure. It is the situations where there is an open position with candidates who are on the market.

Why? Fear. Fear is present on both sides. Company needs to fill a gab that is causing stress and pain not being filled while the candidate needs a job yesterday. In many cases, both sides are not asking the tough questions because they do not want to hear the answer. They are not taking the time to do proper due diligence to determine fit. Going through the motions and hoping for the best only to find the chemistry is not there. In other words, positions are filled based on technical fit - that is easy. Chemistry, culture and future goals are not examined in these situations. Ironically, chemistry, culture and goals are the reasons for separation.

So what is the answer? My experience says time allows for great decisions in relation to hiring. To the outside, may seem like a decision was made quickly, but the process tells a different story. Networking! People staying in tune with what is going on in their business and keeping tabs on what other companies are doing. Hiring trends - needs assessment. Companies doing the same. Both the personal brand and the culture brand are known to each other and when the time is right, change happens. Could be now, could be in a few years. Fear is minimized because of knowledge.

Do you have an argument for or against taking time in such a critical decision, even if it mean short term financial hardship?

[David Sandusky]

Kent Blumberg posted a scenario that is worth a read about a new job not being what you expect. The comments rally around resume entries and learning how to sell. After you read the scenario, you might agree this is a case where proper due diligence and early decision making may be the root challenge and learning opportunity.

What say you?